J Rheum Dis
Published online December 4, 2024
© Korean College of Rheumatology
Correspondence to : Anthony James Ocon, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-5429
Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Rochester Regional Health, 10 Hagen Dr. Suite 330, Rochester, New York 14625, USA. E-mail: Anthony.ocon@rochesterregional.org
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: Serum 14-3-3eta are novel biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is not clear whether 14-3-3eta may be present in other forms of inflammatory arthritis (IA). We evaluated the presence of 14-3-3eta as a diagnostic biomarker in the evaluation IA.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were evaluated for IA by a rheumatologist with a result for the lab test of 14-3-3eta was conducted.
Results: Of 280 included patients, 30% were diagnosed with RA, 11% with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 59% with another condition. Twenty-four (9%) patients had positive results for 14-3-3eta. Fifty-two percent of positive patients were diagnosed with RA, with 48% having another diagnosis including axial spondyloarthritis, gout, Sjögren’s, undifferentiated IA, diabetic cheiroarthropathy, prostate cancer with bone metastasis, osteoarthritis, unspecified arthralgia. No patients with PsA had a positive value. RA patients had a higher value for 14-3-3eta compared to non-RA (5.44 [1.56~9.31] vs. 0.69 [0.40~0.98] ng/mL, p=0.03, square brackets are 95% confidence interval values). The mean value for the 14-3-3eta in seropositive RA trended higher than seronegative (8.0 [2.3~13.7] vs. 1.4 [0.4~2.4] ng/mL, p=0.06). In the RA cohort, elevated 14-3-3eta was associated with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (odd ratio=6.62 [1.24~47.09], p<0.04), but not other variables.
Conclusion: 14-3-3eta may aid as a diagnostic biomarker of RA. However, it is not specific for RA, especially at low positive levels, and may be positive in other forms of IA. Ideal cutoff values need to be established for RA and non-RA conditions. It was not found in PsA.
Keywords 14-3-3 proteins, Biomarkers, Rheumatoid arthritis, Psoriatic arthritis, Inflammatory arthritis
J Rheum Dis
Published online December 4, 2024
Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.
Roshan Subedi, M.D.1 , Afrah Misbah, M.D.2 , Adnan Al Najada, M.D.2 , Anthony James Ocon, M.D., Ph.D.2,3,4
1Division of Rheumatology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 2Department of Medicine, 3Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Rochester Regional Health, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
Correspondence to:Anthony James Ocon, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-5429
Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Rochester Regional Health, 10 Hagen Dr. Suite 330, Rochester, New York 14625, USA. E-mail: Anthony.ocon@rochesterregional.org
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: Serum 14-3-3eta are novel biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is not clear whether 14-3-3eta may be present in other forms of inflammatory arthritis (IA). We evaluated the presence of 14-3-3eta as a diagnostic biomarker in the evaluation IA.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were evaluated for IA by a rheumatologist with a result for the lab test of 14-3-3eta was conducted.
Results: Of 280 included patients, 30% were diagnosed with RA, 11% with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 59% with another condition. Twenty-four (9%) patients had positive results for 14-3-3eta. Fifty-two percent of positive patients were diagnosed with RA, with 48% having another diagnosis including axial spondyloarthritis, gout, Sjögren’s, undifferentiated IA, diabetic cheiroarthropathy, prostate cancer with bone metastasis, osteoarthritis, unspecified arthralgia. No patients with PsA had a positive value. RA patients had a higher value for 14-3-3eta compared to non-RA (5.44 [1.56~9.31] vs. 0.69 [0.40~0.98] ng/mL, p=0.03, square brackets are 95% confidence interval values). The mean value for the 14-3-3eta in seropositive RA trended higher than seronegative (8.0 [2.3~13.7] vs. 1.4 [0.4~2.4] ng/mL, p=0.06). In the RA cohort, elevated 14-3-3eta was associated with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (odd ratio=6.62 [1.24~47.09], p<0.04), but not other variables.
Conclusion: 14-3-3eta may aid as a diagnostic biomarker of RA. However, it is not specific for RA, especially at low positive levels, and may be positive in other forms of IA. Ideal cutoff values need to be established for RA and non-RA conditions. It was not found in PsA.
Keywords: 14-3-3 proteins, Biomarkers, Rheumatoid arthritis, Psoriatic arthritis, Inflammatory arthritis
Youngjae Park, M.D., Mei-Ling Li, M.D., Ji-Won Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Jung Hee Koh, M.D., Ph.D., Yune-Jung Park, M.D., Ph.D., Wan-Uk Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2022; 29(2): 98-107Jinhyun Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Jung Hee Koh, M.D., Ph.D., Sung Jae Choi, M.D., Ph.D., Chan Hong Jeon, M.D., Ph.D., Seung-Ki Kwok, M.D., Ph.D., Seong-Kyu Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Chan-Bum Choi, M.D., Ph.D., Jaejoon Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Changhoon Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Eon Jeong Nam, M.D., Ph.D., Yong-Beom Park, M.D., Ph.D., Shin-Seok Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Tae-Hwan Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Sung-Hwan Park, M.D., Ph.D., Jung-Yoon Choe, M.D., Ph.D., Eun-Mi Koh, M.D., Ph.D., Dae-Hyun Yoo, M.D., Ph.D., Yeong Wook Song, M.D., Ph.D., Hyoun-Ah Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Kichul Shin, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2021; 28(4): 176-182Eun-Jung Park, M.D., Hyungjin Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Seung Min Jung, M.D., Ph.D., Yoon-Kyoung Sung, M.D., Ph.D., Han Joo Baek, M.D., Ph.D., Jisoo Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2020; 27(1): 4-21