Original Article

J Rheum Dis 2017; 24(4): 211-219

Published online August 31, 2017

© Korean College of Rheumatology

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab and Adalimumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Young Ho Lee, Gwan Gyu Song

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to : Young Ho Lee, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea. E-mail:lyhcgh@korea.ac.kr

Received: April 6, 2017; Revised: May 8, 2017; Accepted: May 22, 2017

This is a Open Access article, which permits unrestricted non-commerical use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and adalimumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with direct and indirect data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of efficacy and safety of secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and adalimumab 40 mg in patients with active AS. Results. Five RCTs (1,483 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria of ≥20% (ASAS20) response rate was significantly higher in the adalimumab 40 mg (Odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% credible interval [CrI], 2.09∼8.08), secukinumab 150 mg (OR, 3.35; 95% CrI, 1.73∼6.56), and 75 mg dose (OR, 2.44; 95% CrI, 1.06∼5.05) than with placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that adalimumab 40 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving an ASAS20 response (SUCRA=0.8753), followed by secukinumab 150 mg (SUCRA=0.7051), secukinumab 75 mg (SUCRA=0.4113), and placebo (SUCRA=0.0083). The ASAS40 response rate distribution pattern was similar to the ASAS20 response rate. However, the number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly among the treatment options. Conclusion. Secukinumab and adalimumab were effective for the treatment of active AS without causing a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Keywords Secukinumab, Adalimumab, Ankylosing spondylitis, Network meta-analysis

Article

Original Article

J Rheum Dis 2017; 24(4): 211-219

Published online August 31, 2017 https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2017.24.4.211

Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab and Adalimumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Young Ho Lee, Gwan Gyu Song

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Young Ho Lee, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea. E-mail:lyhcgh@korea.ac.kr

Received: April 6, 2017; Revised: May 8, 2017; Accepted: May 22, 2017

This is a Open Access article, which permits unrestricted non-commerical use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and adalimumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with direct and indirect data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of efficacy and safety of secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and adalimumab 40 mg in patients with active AS. Results. Five RCTs (1,483 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria of ≥20% (ASAS20) response rate was significantly higher in the adalimumab 40 mg (Odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% credible interval [CrI], 2.09∼8.08), secukinumab 150 mg (OR, 3.35; 95% CrI, 1.73∼6.56), and 75 mg dose (OR, 2.44; 95% CrI, 1.06∼5.05) than with placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that adalimumab 40 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving an ASAS20 response (SUCRA=0.8753), followed by secukinumab 150 mg (SUCRA=0.7051), secukinumab 75 mg (SUCRA=0.4113), and placebo (SUCRA=0.0083). The ASAS40 response rate distribution pattern was similar to the ASAS20 response rate. However, the number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly among the treatment options. Conclusion. Secukinumab and adalimumab were effective for the treatment of active AS without causing a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Keywords: Secukinumab, Adalimumab, Ankylosing spondylitis, Network meta-analysis

JRD
Oct 01, 2024 Vol.31 No.4, pp. 191~263
COVER PICTURE
Ancestry-driven pathways for SLE-risk SNP-associated genes. The ancestry-driven key signaling pathways in Asians, Europeans, and African Americans were analyzed by enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/#libraries) using non-HLA SNP-associated genes. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism, JAK–STAT: janus kinase–signal transducers and activators of transcription, IFN: interferon gamma. (J Rheum Dis 2024;31:200-211)

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JRD

Journal of Rheumatic Diseases

pISSN 2093-940X
eISSN 2233-4718
qr-code Download