J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(2): 79-84
Published online June 30, 2011
© Korean College of Rheumatology
조윤제2ㆍ전영수1ㆍ김강일1ㆍ유기형1ㆍ유명철1ㆍ홍세혁1
경희대학교 의과대학 강동 경희대학교병원 정형외과학교실1, 경희의료원 정형외과학교실2
Correspondence to : Young Soo Chun
Objective. This study analyzed the midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods. Between October of 2003 and September of 2008, 13 consecutive hips that were treated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to rheumatoid arthritis were analyzed. The average follow up period was 48.6 months and the mean age at the time of operation was 35.9 years old. The mean BMI at the operation was 23.2 kg/m2. The implanted prostheses were the Conserve Plus system in five hips, the Birmingham hip resurfacing system in four hips and the Durom system in four hips. The results were clinically evaluated with the Harris hip score, the UCLA activity score, hip or thigh pain, the limb length discrepancy and the range of motion. As radiological evaluation, we observed the patterns of bone remodeling and complications such as femoral neck fracture, loosening and osteolysis.
Results. The average Harris hip score improved from 62.2 to 98.9 at the final visit. The range of motion improved to 0o in flexion contracture, 118.1o in further flexion, 22.7o in internal rotation, 40.4o in external rotation, 28.8o in adduction and 38.1o in abduction, respectively. No patient complained of a limb length discrepancy and hip or thigh pain. Radiographically, impingement between the acetabular component and the femoral neck was observed in one case. However, radiographic findings such as osteolysis, radiolucency, wear and loosening were not observed.
Conclusion. The midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were excellent. But long-term studies are needed to determine the survivorship and to evaluate the osteoporotic change, the metal ion level and their influence after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Keywords Rheumatoid arthritis, Hip resurfacing arthroplasty
J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(2): 79-84
Published online June 30, 2011
Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.
조윤제2ㆍ전영수1ㆍ김강일1ㆍ유기형1ㆍ유명철1ㆍ홍세혁1
경희대학교 의과대학 강동 경희대학교병원 정형외과학교실1, 경희의료원 정형외과학교실2
Yoon Je Cho2, Young Soo Chun1, Kang Il Kim1, Kee Hyung Rhyu1, Myung Chul Yoo1, Se Hyuk Hong1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong1, Kyung Hee Medical Center2, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Young Soo Chun
Objective. This study analyzed the midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods. Between October of 2003 and September of 2008, 13 consecutive hips that were treated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to rheumatoid arthritis were analyzed. The average follow up period was 48.6 months and the mean age at the time of operation was 35.9 years old. The mean BMI at the operation was 23.2 kg/m2. The implanted prostheses were the Conserve Plus system in five hips, the Birmingham hip resurfacing system in four hips and the Durom system in four hips. The results were clinically evaluated with the Harris hip score, the UCLA activity score, hip or thigh pain, the limb length discrepancy and the range of motion. As radiological evaluation, we observed the patterns of bone remodeling and complications such as femoral neck fracture, loosening and osteolysis.
Results. The average Harris hip score improved from 62.2 to 98.9 at the final visit. The range of motion improved to 0o in flexion contracture, 118.1o in further flexion, 22.7o in internal rotation, 40.4o in external rotation, 28.8o in adduction and 38.1o in abduction, respectively. No patient complained of a limb length discrepancy and hip or thigh pain. Radiographically, impingement between the acetabular component and the femoral neck was observed in one case. However, radiographic findings such as osteolysis, radiolucency, wear and loosening were not observed.
Conclusion. The midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were excellent. But long-term studies are needed to determine the survivorship and to evaluate the osteoporotic change, the metal ion level and their influence after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, Hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Soo Min Ahn, M.D., Ph.D., Seonok Kim, MSc., Ye-Jee Kim, Ph.D., Seokchan Hong, M.D., Ph.D., Chang-Keun Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Bin Yoo, M.D., Ph.D., Ji Seon Oh, M.D., Ph.D., Yong-Gil Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis -0001; ():Roshan Subedi, M.D., Afrah Misbah, M.D., Adnan Al Najada, M.D., Anthony James Ocon, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis -0001; ():Hee Jun Kim, R.N., Ph.D., Ju-Yang Jung, M.D., Ph.D., Ji-Won Kim, M.D., Chang-Hee Suh, M.D., Ph.D., Hyoun-Ah Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2025; 32(1): 38-47