Original Article

J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(2): 79-84

Published online June 30, 2011

© Korean College of Rheumatology

류마티스관절염에서 시행한 고관절 표면 치환술

조윤제2ㆍ전영수1ㆍ김강일1ㆍ유기형1ㆍ유명철1ㆍ홍세혁1

경희대학교 의과대학 강동 경희대학교병원 정형외과학교실1, 경희의료원 정형외과학교실2

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Yoon Je Cho2, Young Soo Chun1, Kang Il Kim1, Kee Hyung Rhyu1, Myung Chul Yoo1, Se Hyuk Hong1

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong1, Kyung Hee Medical Center2, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to : Young Soo Chun

Abstract

Objective. This study analyzed the midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods. Between October of 2003 and September of 2008, 13 consecutive hips that were treated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to rheumatoid arthritis were analyzed. The average follow up period was 48.6 months and the mean age at the time of operation was 35.9 years old. The mean BMI at the operation was 23.2 kg/m2. The implanted prostheses were the Conserve Plus system in five hips, the Birmingham hip resurfacing system in four hips and the Durom system in four hips. The results were clinically evaluated with the Harris hip score, the UCLA activity score, hip or thigh pain, the limb length discrepancy and the range of motion. As radiological evaluation, we observed the patterns of bone remodeling and complications such as femoral neck fracture, loosening and osteolysis.
Results. The average Harris hip score improved from 62.2 to 98.9 at the final visit. The range of motion improved to 0o in flexion contracture, 118.1o in further flexion, 22.7o in internal rotation, 40.4o in external rotation, 28.8o in adduction and 38.1o in abduction, respectively. No patient complained of a limb length discrepancy and hip or thigh pain. Radiographically, impingement between the acetabular component and the femoral neck was observed in one case. However, radiographic findings such as osteolysis, radiolucency, wear and loosening were not observed.
Conclusion. The midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were excellent. But long-term studies are needed to determine the survivorship and to evaluate the osteoporotic change, the metal ion level and their influence after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Keywords Rheumatoid arthritis, Hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Article

Original Article

J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(2): 79-84

Published online June 30, 2011

Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.

류마티스관절염에서 시행한 고관절 표면 치환술

조윤제2ㆍ전영수1ㆍ김강일1ㆍ유기형1ㆍ유명철1ㆍ홍세혁1

경희대학교 의과대학 강동 경희대학교병원 정형외과학교실1, 경희의료원 정형외과학교실2

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Yoon Je Cho2, Young Soo Chun1, Kang Il Kim1, Kee Hyung Rhyu1, Myung Chul Yoo1, Se Hyuk Hong1

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong1, Kyung Hee Medical Center2, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Young Soo Chun

Abstract

Objective. This study analyzed the midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods. Between October of 2003 and September of 2008, 13 consecutive hips that were treated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to rheumatoid arthritis were analyzed. The average follow up period was 48.6 months and the mean age at the time of operation was 35.9 years old. The mean BMI at the operation was 23.2 kg/m2. The implanted prostheses were the Conserve Plus system in five hips, the Birmingham hip resurfacing system in four hips and the Durom system in four hips. The results were clinically evaluated with the Harris hip score, the UCLA activity score, hip or thigh pain, the limb length discrepancy and the range of motion. As radiological evaluation, we observed the patterns of bone remodeling and complications such as femoral neck fracture, loosening and osteolysis.
Results. The average Harris hip score improved from 62.2 to 98.9 at the final visit. The range of motion improved to 0o in flexion contracture, 118.1o in further flexion, 22.7o in internal rotation, 40.4o in external rotation, 28.8o in adduction and 38.1o in abduction, respectively. No patient complained of a limb length discrepancy and hip or thigh pain. Radiographically, impingement between the acetabular component and the femoral neck was observed in one case. However, radiographic findings such as osteolysis, radiolucency, wear and loosening were not observed.
Conclusion. The midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were excellent. But long-term studies are needed to determine the survivorship and to evaluate the osteoporotic change, the metal ion level and their influence after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, Hip resurfacing arthroplasty

JRD
Jan 01, 2025 Vol.32 No.1, pp. 1~7
COVER PICTURE
Cumulative growth of rheumatology members and specialists (1980~2024). Cumulative distribution of the number of the (A) Korean College of Rheumatology members and (B) rheumatology specialists. (J Rheum Dis 2025;32:63-65)

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JRD

Journal of Rheumatic Diseases

pISSN 2093-940X
eISSN 2233-4718
qr-code Download