Review Article

J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(3): 153-160

Published online September 30, 2011

© Korean College of Rheumatology

섬유근통 증후군의 새로운 진단기준과 임상적 의의

이신석

전남대학교 의과대학 류마티스내과학교실

Newer Diagnostic Criteria of Fibromyalgia and Its Clinical Implications

Shin-Seok Lee

Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

Correspondence to : Shin-Seok Lee

Abstract

Since Smythe and Moldofsky proposed the first modern definition of fibromyalgia (FM), a number of different classification and diagnostic criteria have emerged. Among these criteria, the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria have been the most widely accepted in both research and clinical settings. The 1990 ACR criteria were originally established as inclusion criteria for research purposes and were not intended for clinical diagnosis, but have become the de facto diagnostic criteria in clinical settings. However, an improved clinical case definition for FM, using diagnostic criteria that can be used by both primary care physicians and specialists has been desired for a long time. For this, Wolfe and colleagues developed several sets of diagnostic criteria and their last one received the endorsement of ACR, which is now known as the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria. Unfortunately, the new criteria have been criticized as being inconsistent, non-specific, and lacking the ability to recognize FM concurrent with other diseases. Further studies are needed to assess the acceptance, reliability, and validity of the new criteria in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

Keywords Fibromyalgia, Diagnostic, Criteria

Article

Review Article

J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(3): 153-160

Published online September 30, 2011

Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.

섬유근통 증후군의 새로운 진단기준과 임상적 의의

이신석

전남대학교 의과대학 류마티스내과학교실

Newer Diagnostic Criteria of Fibromyalgia and Its Clinical Implications

Shin-Seok Lee

Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

Correspondence to:Shin-Seok Lee

Abstract

Since Smythe and Moldofsky proposed the first modern definition of fibromyalgia (FM), a number of different classification and diagnostic criteria have emerged. Among these criteria, the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria have been the most widely accepted in both research and clinical settings. The 1990 ACR criteria were originally established as inclusion criteria for research purposes and were not intended for clinical diagnosis, but have become the de facto diagnostic criteria in clinical settings. However, an improved clinical case definition for FM, using diagnostic criteria that can be used by both primary care physicians and specialists has been desired for a long time. For this, Wolfe and colleagues developed several sets of diagnostic criteria and their last one received the endorsement of ACR, which is now known as the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria. Unfortunately, the new criteria have been criticized as being inconsistent, non-specific, and lacking the ability to recognize FM concurrent with other diseases. Further studies are needed to assess the acceptance, reliability, and validity of the new criteria in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

Keywords: Fibromyalgia, Diagnostic, Criteria

JRD
Oct 01, 2024 Vol.31 No.4, pp. 191~263
COVER PICTURE
Ancestry-driven pathways for SLE-risk SNP-associated genes. The ancestry-driven key signaling pathways in Asians, Europeans, and African Americans were analyzed by enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/#libraries) using non-HLA SNP-associated genes. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism, JAK–STAT: janus kinase–signal transducers and activators of transcription, IFN: interferon gamma. (J Rheum Dis 2024;31:200-211)

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JRD

Journal of Rheumatic Diseases

pISSN 2093-940X
eISSN 2233-4718
qr-code Download