J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(3): 187-192
Published online September 30, 2011
© Korean College of Rheumatology
서영일ㆍ손경민ㆍ정영옥ㆍ김인제ㆍ김경리ㆍ배영덕ㆍ김현아
한림대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
Correspondence to : Young-Il Seo
Objective. The prevalence of gout has increased so accurate diagnosis and constant treatment is important in its management. The purpose this study was to examine the current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of gout patients in Korea.
Methods. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed as having gout and received treatment in university hospital between 2005 and 2008. From the survey, we assessed and analyzed the patient's baseline characteristics, clinical aspects of gout attack, medical institution and specialized department in the first gouty attack, medical institution and specialized department where the gout was initially diagnosed, methods of diagnosis, treatment during gout attack, and knowledge about gout in patients.
Results. A total of 136 patients were included in this study, out of which 123 (90.4%) were male and the mean age was 55.2 (range 25∼85) years. When patients experienced the first gout attack, the most common medical institution that they attended was a private clinic and the most common specialized department was orthopedics. Medication by oral route was the major method (80.9%) used for the treatment of gout, and the most common medication was a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in 55.9%, allopurinol in 38.2% and colchicine in 20.6% of patients. Many gout patients inappropriately received allopurinol following signs of gout arthritis attack, with little information specifically about gout.
Conclusion. In our survey, many gout patients received inadequate medications for the treatment of gout and had little knowledge about the disease. For the adequate treatment of gout, patients and doctors need to be educated sufficiently.
Keywords Gout, Treatment, Education, Survey
J Rheum Dis 2011; 18(3): 187-192
Published online September 30, 2011
Copyright © Korean College of Rheumatology.
서영일ㆍ손경민ㆍ정영옥ㆍ김인제ㆍ김경리ㆍ배영덕ㆍ김현아
한림대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
Young-Il Seo, Kyeong Min Son, Young Ok Jung, In Je Kim, Kyung Lee Kim, Young Deok Bae, Hyun Ah Kim
Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
Correspondence to:Young-Il Seo
Objective. The prevalence of gout has increased so accurate diagnosis and constant treatment is important in its management. The purpose this study was to examine the current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of gout patients in Korea.
Methods. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed as having gout and received treatment in university hospital between 2005 and 2008. From the survey, we assessed and analyzed the patient's baseline characteristics, clinical aspects of gout attack, medical institution and specialized department in the first gouty attack, medical institution and specialized department where the gout was initially diagnosed, methods of diagnosis, treatment during gout attack, and knowledge about gout in patients.
Results. A total of 136 patients were included in this study, out of which 123 (90.4%) were male and the mean age was 55.2 (range 25∼85) years. When patients experienced the first gout attack, the most common medical institution that they attended was a private clinic and the most common specialized department was orthopedics. Medication by oral route was the major method (80.9%) used for the treatment of gout, and the most common medication was a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in 55.9%, allopurinol in 38.2% and colchicine in 20.6% of patients. Many gout patients inappropriately received allopurinol following signs of gout arthritis attack, with little information specifically about gout.
Conclusion. In our survey, many gout patients received inadequate medications for the treatment of gout and had little knowledge about the disease. For the adequate treatment of gout, patients and doctors need to be educated sufficiently.
Keywords: Gout, Treatment, Education, Survey
Jennifer Jooha Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Ji Soo Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Min Kyung Chung, M.D., Ph.D., Joong Kyong Ahn, M.D., Ph.D., Hyo-Jin Choi, M.D., Ph.D., Seung-Jae Hong, M.D., Ph.D., Chong-Hyeon Yoon, M.D., Ph.D., Su-Hyun Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Kyung-Hwan Jeong, M.D., Ph.D., Jong-Woo Kim, M.D., Bo-Yeon Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Jin-Ho Shin, M.D., Ph.D., Woo Gyu Kim, M.D., Soo-Young Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Hyun-Jung Kim, Ph.D., Jeong-Soo Song, M.D., Ph.D., Jae-Bum Jun, M.D., Ph.D., Hyun-Ah Park, M.D., Ph.D., Shung Chull Chae, M.D., Ph.D., Bum Soon Choi, M.D., Ph.D., Tae Nyun Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Hyun Ah Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2023; 30(3): 141-150Joong Kyong Ahn, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2023; 30(2): 88-98Eun Young Ahn, M.D., Min Wook So, M.D., Ph.D.
J Rheum Dis 2025; 32(1): 8-16